tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976303.post8660723993871764246..comments2024-03-24T05:22:27.179-04:00Comments on Orthonomics: PSA: Seminar, The Jewish Family's Approach to MoneyOrthonomicshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07892074485262548496noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976303.post-64757564086365524362010-12-10T17:35:52.374-05:002010-12-10T17:35:52.374-05:00Oh, and they have no chance of a lawsuit -- they s...Oh, and they have no chance of a lawsuit -- they signed away any chance of that when they accepted being on the show/arbitration.Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04391023891253673160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976303.post-11832004390161260232010-12-10T17:32:12.869-05:002010-12-10T17:32:12.869-05:00Frankly, Rabbi Hoffman's defense is as convinc...Frankly, Rabbi Hoffman's defense is as convincing (at least to me) as Kosher Bacon.<br /><br />But, even if we take their latest version of events as the absolute truth -- they still attempted to defraud the laundromat (and the court).<br /><br />Their latest version has them getting a replacement wig from Georgie for $1500.<br /><br />When someone damages or destroys something of yours, they are not liable for what you paid for it, they are liable for the replacement cost or fair market value. <br /><br />The replacement costs, therefore, would have been $1500. But they didn't submit that information (or even disclose that they had replaced the wig) to the court. <br /><br />So if I am as charitable as can be, they are still (by their own account) guilty of attempted fraud, and of attempting to deceive the court.Davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04391023891253673160noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976303.post-86195544553162788222010-12-10T12:02:11.462-05:002010-12-10T12:02:11.462-05:00a few days ago, I shared the link to the you-tube ...a few days ago, I shared the link to the you-tube of the couple who went to people's court to sue for a ruined wig. I at first believed that it was possible fraud or perjury on their part. Apparently, they were telling the truth and the judge got the wrong information from the wig seller.<br />There might now be a lawsuit against People's court. The couple went on TV so that if the laundramat owners lost, the station would cover the loss rather than to come from the owners.rosienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976303.post-27005751509595783582010-12-09T17:07:58.487-05:002010-12-09T17:07:58.487-05:00Oops. Corrected.Oops. Corrected.Orthonomicshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07892074485262548496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21976303.post-65735562833557579932010-12-09T15:26:23.317-05:002010-12-09T15:26:23.317-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Avi Greengarthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14267040237664555562noreply@blogger.com